Views From Within

Internet Political Prophecies And Subversive Material For Cool People

Archive for January, 2007

Maliki Thinks HE’S “The Decider”

Posted by jeremiasx on January 31, 2007

Who does this Maliki guy think he is…why is he always in our way when we want to do stuff like use his country as a staging ground for our Middle East conquest?? Jeez…

Maliki thinks we can’t have an Iran war in Iraq…CNN story

This boy better get with the program….we were fighting Iran through Iraq (as an intermediary) all through the 80s…it was called the Iran-Iraq war…maybe he just doesn’t know his history. Hey look…it’s Rummy!

rumsfeld_saddam.jpg

Advertisements

Posted in Al Qaeda, America, Arkansas, Dissent, Freedom, George Bush, Iraq, Justice, Liberty, Life, Media, News, Peace, Politics, Random | Leave a Comment »

Libby’s Memory Trial

Posted by jeremiasx on January 31, 2007

Bad memory makes for big scandal…ask these guys…

ronaldreaganfunny.jpg

 They love to say things like, “I do not recall…” but only in trials…when it credits them, they can remember stuff from WAY back…but hey, my 3 year old is the same way.

ollienorthswearing.jpg

Posted in America, Conspiracy, Conspiracy Theories, Dissent, Freedom, George Bush, Justice, Liberty, Life, Media, News, Politics | Leave a Comment »

Policing the CIA

Posted by jeremiasx on January 31, 2007

Well I guess somebody had to do it…these guys most likely won’t.

bushonciaseal.jpg

Spain seems very active in global prosecutions…

Reuters Story of Spain Checking CIA Flight Logs

 Seems like Germany is tired of CIA BS too…

International Herald Tribune Story on Arrest of 13 CIA Agents in Germany

Posted in 9/11, Al Qaeda, America, Arkansas, Conspiracy, Conspiracy Theories, Dissent, Freedom, George Bush, Iraq, Justice, Liberty, Life, Media, News, Peace, Politics, Tyranny, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

A Call To Action…My Mini-Manifesto

Posted by jeremiasx on January 30, 2007

The antithesis of Democracy and the beginning of Fascism is the rule of the elite usurping the rule of the People by real representation…or more aptly these days the death of the idea of rule by the People, for the People. I firmly believe this has too long been the case in our very own United States government. Any person of even minimal intelligence must make the assumption that as long as big money and big corporate influence keeps funneling its way into the coffers of the present “Republicrat” party system, the chances for diversity in political thought and action will never exist. I contend that the idea that America has even HAS two distinctive parties is an illusion that should be smashed presently. Both parties conspire together, while conspiring against each other in contrived incidents, to dominate the minds and lives of the populace with a cunning so Machiavellian it will only be exposed and hopefully overthrown by the work of diligent men and women who are beholden to the cause of Truth, Justice and Freedom.

 

Consider this. What truly fresh ideas and faces have been offered by our government? Are we not hearing the same tired lines and lies that we’ve been hearing for multiple generations, while the situation for the average American steadily declines? How much government do we actually NEED? Must we assume the politicians are ignorant of the simple, fundamental problems within our country…and that no real practical or lasting solutions can be offered or implemented for the GOOD of the governed? No, I believe the American political arena consists of mostly staged events with actors chosen to toe party lines and deliver contemporary party ideas, which they are quick to espouse and slow to implement. These same actors are either knowingly or unwittingly participating in a conspiratorial effort to elude public scrutiny in plane view, very quietly and very effectively. Our current governing body appears to most global spectators to be an imperialist regime run by corporate influences. It is an unholy alliance between those we believe and hope to be representing the common interest (but don’t) and the corporations and interests who control them so they can not. We must take action to rectify the situation before it’s too late.

In the interest of real reform, timing is of a critical essence. We are rapidly approaching the point of no return. Recently, there has been a much more apparent loss of confidence in the government than was previously perceived by the general public, as a whole. The decayed political apparatus stinks to high heave, and is ripe for change, and it needs to be changed. We don’t even have to adopt some experimental form of government…the original of the intent of the framers of our Republic spelled out their plans in plain English. Reverting to a true Constitutional form of government would be an adequate and even excellent idea.

 

Money in politics is also a force for evil, whereas the Newspeak fascists will call it a freedom of expression when it comes to lobbying for influence. How can it be freedom of expression if the majority (the poor) don’t get to express themselves as freely? This defies all common sense. The largest donors to political campaigns are mostly corporate forces who seek to malignantly, or at least negligently (though that’s a charitable stretch) exploit the working class men and women of this country, and other countries, while maintaining a façade of benevolence all the while. Does it surprise any of you to know that a number of Republican senators, some of whom are campaigning for President in 2008, sponsored a bill that would effectively eliminate any federal minimum wage standards? This is lunacy. The sadder fact remains that most people are so out of touch that they don’t even know what legislation takes place, how their representative voted, or what critical changes have occurred in the last five years since 9/11 that have sped us on our way to a police state which will enslave us to corporate interests and deny us of the same basic liberties our forefathers fought and died to defend.

 

If people knew the TRUTH (not the Media version) about what is happening in global, national, and state politics there would be an overwhelming desire for meaningful and immediate revolution. A growing movement aimed at political reform may indeed set us on a path to redemption, if not at least the beginning of progress. However, I’m fearful that again this is just posturing and play-acting by our so-called representatives which will end up being business as usual.

 

The government, the state of affairs in our nation, and our image throughout the world…I’m not proud of any of it at this moment. This country, in this century already, but more particularly the last one, has made itself fat off of the exploitation of the whole world, including our own recent ancestors (your parents, grandparents, etc.) This exploitation stems from a perceived economic necessity which the system has created for us and operates symbiotically within our consumer culture gone awry. Do we NEED the things that we are trained by media advertising to believe we need? Hardly. We are a culture that is addicted to consumerism and convenience. The image of the average American as fat and lazy is not really that far off the mark, until you slide beneath the poverty level and view the plight of the faceless masses. Furthermore, as a people we have been told to still be content regardless of moral consequence, and then pacified by fear. Insultingly enough we have been coerced by the corporations to buy cheaply made goodies and lick the sweat off of the suffering of the huddled masses, as well as our own sweat which barely pays the bills, and economists trumpet our so-called “success” throughout the world as a tribute to globalization and a so-called “service economy”.

 

The term the government likes to promote, “service economy”, has an interesting connotation that I don’t believe the majority of the public at large understands. It’s not far from the medieval system of feudalism when you see it for what it truly is. What is it? It is a movement or economic philosophy that apparently seeks to globally redistribute wealth for the good of the governing corporate bodies and their unwitting (or complicit) co-conspirators, the shareholders. It arguably benefits them and possibly the impoverished souls who now have our old jobs overseas. Meanwhile, we as a people are told to be happy to serve hot coffee to the well-to-do at Starbucks while they set off to work in those same once-smoky rooms where they will probably plot our further demise as a country. This is an extreme simplification, but look around you…look at your life. Whom do you truly serve? Do you serve the interests of your family and posterity, or do you mostly labor for the benefit of others who are higher on the social food chain?

 

Have we sold our souls for the sake of the bottom line? There is evidence which condemns and indicts us on this count, irrefutably and consistently. Whole cities and states within our union have suffered the consequences, and the poor are the ones who suffer the brunt of this assault on our livelihoods. It was once said by a great man, “Poverty is the worst form of violence.” I’ve seen it firsthand, time and time again.

 

Wars and rumors of wars have traditionally kept our allies and enemies in line, yet it seems that lately we can’t even topple a small government anymore without the whole world snapping at us and baring their fangs. In essence, some are calling us on our ruse, and new alliances are being forged just 90 miles off our coast between countries which despise us and would love to see nothing less than our utter demise as a society and a superpower. The fact that our State Department has made little or no progress in preventing these actions by implementing real foreign policy which seeks to do something about it leads me to believe they are either utterly incompetent OR traitors who are working ardently to create enemies for us to later fight in other wars.

 

 

If people looked beyond the so-called nuclear proliferations standoff they would see a clear plan by the current administration to destabilize South Asia and the Middle East to remold them in the shape they see best fitting, probably the shape which allows the oil companies to fit in better and make higher profit margins. It’s also nice to have more leverage in Southwest Asia and the Far East to deal with the rising superpower which is China. Either way, we are being misled into actions which are again immoral and potentially disastrous.

 

False flag operations, those which incite the American people to support “just wars” have been used in almost every major conflict of the 20th century, including WWI (Zimmerman letter, the Lusitania), WWII (Pearl Harbor, we knew it was coming) The Cold War (propaganda fueling mass hysteria about nuclear war at ANY moment), and Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin) have all been proven beyond reasonable doubt to essentially be false flag operations or failed foreign policy theories. This may sound like conspiracy kook talk, but these are real wars, and real events that compelled and propelled us into them…how much of a stretch is it to believe that 9/11 was in fact a false flag operation conducted by our government to spin us into a wartime economy and mindset? Do we really believe, as a people, that 19 Muslim men who could barely fly Cessnas were able to overtake Boeing 767s and successfully fly them into major buildings (and the Pentagon, especially) without being shot down by NORAD and the USAF, whom we were told publicly and repeatedly were ready to rapid deploy and take out nuclear-capable forces within 20 minutes of notice? Give me a break. One is forced to believe one of two scenarios. (Or if you like, come up with your own and let me know what YOU are thinking.)

Here is the first scenario, which our government would like us to believe after waiting 411 days from the day of the incident to begin investigations, and funding it with an initial offer of $3 MILLION dollars. Folks…that is criminal complicity or conspiracy to cover-up if there ever was such a thing. It is the longest gap between a major event and an initial committee investigation, and it is one of the poorest funded investigations in the history of our nation. I’ll go ahead and insert part of the bill which enacted this farcical commission so you don’t think I’m just joking.

SEC. 611. FUNDING.

(a) Transfer From the National Foreign Intelligence Program.–Of the
amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act and made available in
public law 107-248 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003) for
the National Foreign Intelligence Program, not to exceed $3,000,000
shall be available for transfer to the Commission for purposes of the
activities of the Commission under this title.
(b) Duration of Availability.–Amounts made available to the
Commission under subsection (a) shall remain available until the
termination of the Commission.

 

 

The consensus of the 9/11 commission, after sifting through conflicting statements, not being given access to crucial witnesses or documents, and almost becoming so frustrated that one of the commissioners wrote later in a book that, “We were almost tempted to open a seperate investigation into the possibility of obstruction of justice by the FAA and other agencies”, we are told to believe the commission’s ultimate theory that EVERY level of government failed simultaneously to react for over an hour and a half to bring the terrorist attacks to a halt while our beloved President (who claimed to have seen the first plane hit the tower during the time he was en route to the elementary school in three seperate instances) was completely unaware that four hijacked airliners were destroying American lives and property. I could go into much further detail, but time does not permit. Needless to say, a NEW INVESTIGATION is absolutely necessary REGARDLESS of what you believe did or did not happen. There were four seperate commissions that looked into the failures of our government during the Pearl Harbor attack…I believe we need at LEAST ONE MORE to look into the incident that has completely remolded our country in every facet from the erosion of freedoms to the thrashing of our economy.

Our current administrations type of cowboy diplomacy, and it has been aptly named such if one recalls the bloody and inequitable settling of the Western territories in the settling of our own nation, is not moral, ethical, or even neighborly in any way. It is akin, on a microcosmic scale, to having a next-door neighbor whose methods of raising their family are in question. What is our solution as the self-righteous neighbor? We have chosen to starve, isolate, and publicly threaten and belittle that same neighbor, and naively expect them to fold their arms, scratch their head, and say, “Oh God, I guess I must be wrong.” The Amish haven’t folded to that line in our own country for hundreds of years. The Muslim populations of the world will not fold to it either, most likely.

 

The working model prior to the dawn of the 20th century was that regime change should never be effected externally save when the necessity of global or regional security is truly threatened by a nation. There have always been those who have had their fingers in other people’s pies, of course. The main difference was that these types of interventions weren’t implemented with the same type of national hubris and overtly base and self-serving motives as they are today. Internal political reform should come from a mandate from the people of a country in any case. I hope it will be soon within our very own nation, unless we falter and then fail as responsible citizens.

 

If we are skeptical about our globally perpetrated injustices and miseries we need only look to recent history (Cuba, Haiti, Panama, Nicaragua, Liberia, Venezuela, Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and now Iraq as well) to see the results of this failed experiment in “nation building.” We install puppet governments which fail to survive more than a few years, or until we’ve used up the resources we want and are done with them. Perhaps there is something about a lack of willingness to adapt to an obviously selfish and usually malignant alien agenda that thwarts our so-called “charitable” or “humanitarian” efforts in these cases, at least in the mind of the indigenous people. Ironically, the countries which need international intervention due to humanitarian crises of genocidal proportions remain largely ignored. Why?

 

The situation in Iraq pleads for intense scrutiny. The freshly spilled blood of thousands of men, women and children cries out for justice from the soiled ground of a once potent and sovereign nation. The people of Iraq have suffered countless atrocities, most of which only history will reveal. Some of them, they suffered under a despotic dictator…many others, from the U.S. war and subsequent occupation. We, as a people, have stood by for years vicariously and dispassionately watching events unfold without an honest admission that what we have done there is wrong. While we don’t care to admit it, what we are planning to do in that entire region is a massive exploitation of people and natural resources which is aimed at benefiting corporate and Zionist interests (I’m not anti-Semitic, just anti-Zionist) and our own insatiable thirst for energy sources which could easily be attained through alternative technologies.

Speaking of which…most alternative energy sources are unfortunately suppressed, ignored, or under-funded, by a government which would rather enslave the people to the contemporary paradigm of a fossil fuel driven economy. Why? Well, that’s easy…the big oil companies have the money and influence, which hearkens back to my earlier point. This model will remain in place as long as there remain only the voices of dissent within the scientific community who cry out that we are destroying our world at an alarming rate of speed. We, the people who passively accept this policy, are to blame…we can not trust our government to act accordingly.

 

Meanwhile, we continue our imperial march throughout the world, imprisoning children, humiliating and torturing prisoners, and operating under the convenience-oriented policies of regime change and first-strike diplomacy. How can we, as a people, stand idly by while our military attacks places of worship as a means of deterring violence? The contradiction, the irony, and the outlandishness of our actions draws international scorn and ire, yet we question the motives of those who dissent or oppose our policies. I pray that if the same types of policies are ever implemented here in our own nation that someone will speak out on our behalf. We, the people who passively accept these actions, are to blame.

 

Insanity has been defined by many wise people as doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results. As many times as we allow the government to persuade us to accept the idea of limited wars which have no end and mostly profit corporations, that many times we will fail, and lose, as a nation. Meanwhile, the war profiteers, the power barons of the military-industrial complex who count their money and laugh whether we WIN or LOSE these wars remain the driving influence for our atrocities and human losses, our side and the “enemies”. This is the crucial reality.

 

If we look back and view our own country’s progress of late it should cause us to be extremely alarmed. If we could see the reality of the rise of a fascist regime within our midst, we would surely have a call to arms. We have ignored it long enough. Almost every event is planned and staged by some entity, and there is an ample amount of evidence to suggest that we have been misled and suckered by the current administration, as well as those in the past century, into believing that what is ultimately good for our country’s security interests is good for us as a nation, or a people. They systematically erode our freedoms in front of our faces and disdain us to take notice, speak out against it, or try to change it. Both parties in the political spectrum are equally guilty of this condemnation, as they apparently conspire together to further their secret agenda which is most likely world domination and subjugation.

 

We the people, meanwhile, are absolutely letting go of freedom for supposed security. It is a phantom menace we “fight” against. Any novice yogi or spiritualist would probably state that when we fight against our neighbor, we war against the desire and fear that is within. This is said to be the essence of all human suffering, and it is evident in all that I have seen throughout my journeys and observations of the world about. Am I the only one who sees? No. Do I alone care about basic morality or justice, or liberty? Certainly not. Is the pursuit of happiness a long-lost dream, buried beneath the cynicism and tyrannical rule of the elite? I can’t bring myself to believe that it must always be so. I believe in people, not only on an individual basis, but as a whole when properly and justly governed. Sadly, I see all around me the sickness which has resulted from the current levels of injustice and corruption, which will grow in scope and measure if we don’t act quickly. We, the people, must act.

 

We, the people, are the ones who have suffered, and will continue to suffer because of the secrecies and injustices which have existed as an integral instrument of control far too long within the current political regime which includes BOTH parties. I believe that all in leadership positions are guilty of either actively participating in or at least turning a blind eye to this oppressive governance. Exceptions are rare and ineffective.

 

Very few people have spoken publicly for openness and honesty in government affairs, probably out of fear for their personal safety or hopefully for the sake of holding their position secret for the chance of a future victory. Many speak of such things during elections, then fail to follow through with meaningful action. These types of legislators, however, obviously constitute a usually silent minority within the halls of legislature, justice, and administration. They are, de facto, inept and ineffectual because the odds are stacked against them from the outset. The campaign reforms I spoke of earlier could possibly remedy a great deal of corruption. They would seem to be an immediate remedy if things weren’t already so bad that they required immediate attention and action from us as a people.

 

Corruption, greed, despondent nepotism, and secretive political actions which support the current idealistic absolutism and despotism are a pandemic reality in our government. This must become clear to all people. It is critical that something changes or I believe the seeds of revolution which are deeply rooted within our collective consciousness will come to fruition and the outcome could be disastrous. In fact, I believe that the government is actually HOPING for a revolution. It would hasten their implementation of martial law and the imposition of a police state would virtually doom us all to a fate which is far worse than the status quo, even if what we have today is virtually an illusion of freedom.

 

It isn’t necessary to frequent back rooms of coffee shops or art deco parlors of the eccentric liberal left to hear these mutterings. One doesn’t need to infiltrate the pews of conservative churches to hear whispers of malcontent and disdain from the holy rolling far-right either. The Democratic response to the State of the Union address this year actually alluded to some type of “peasant revolt.” Within our nation, ordinary people are talking about needed reform and even military rebellion on an almost daily basis. The ones I’ve heard speaking of these things most of you would consider regular, sane, working class Americans. They’re not UFO chasers or kooks…they’re firemen, policemen, pastors, construction workers, and even your garden variety Wal-Mart employees.

 

It must no longer be the exclusive realm of the political ideologists to inspire people to think about political solutions to this problem. It should be our incumbent duty as citizens of a free country to inspire the people to action. We all must do our part to promote awareness and debate amongst ourselves the best way to proceed. The daily suffering of the people of this nation casts the shadowy threat of tyranny and injustice right in our faces. Ordinary Americans must take immediate and decisive actions to redefine our government as one which serves the people. Clear and present danger must necessitate reform, as usual.

 

If you, the reader, truly believe there isn’t a vast and global conspiracy to oppress, enslave, and dictate the quality and type of life to the common people of this and every other nation then you are truly blind, and woefully or blissfully ignorant. The harsh reality is these conspirators operate daily within plain public view. Sad but true, they function freely on their so-far sound reasoning that as long as no one is scrutinizing their every move, they may legislate their agendas in the halls of power (including those of Congress, Parliament, OPEC, Politburo, and especially the United Nations) with virtual impunity against any type of real oversight or even recognition which might hamper their unlawful and immoral activities.

 

The political shell game confuses the public, which is their goal. They control the majority of the media, and the media in turn controls the perception of the people. We must shine the light of Truth upon them so brightly that they have nowhere left to hide. After that, we must prosecute them severely and publicly to make them answer for the blood they have shed and the lives they have corrupted, diminished, or destroyed. Presently I can not think of an Earthly punishment severe or righteous enough for the types of treason, war crimes, and domestic and global injustices they have ultimately perpetrated on our largely unwitting populace. We must let God above be the Supreme Judge of all, while we do our best in this life to make right what is obviously wrong.

 

There is a solution. The time has come for a massive inquest and full disclosure of the current situation. We deserve it as citizens, after all, aren’t we paying for it? However, this inquiry must NOT be performed by politicians, the foxes who guard the henhouse. It should be performed diligently and thoroughly by independent, non-partisan, and non-politically affiliated Inspectors General. This can and should be a priority for all concerned Americans, and it should happen sooner rather than later.

 

An illumination of the full nature and scope of all our nation’s affairs, foreign and domestic, would be the aim of the inquiry. Its goal shall be a complete and thorough disclosure to the American public regarding the truth concerning all of our government’s practices. This action is a vital starting point and we should demand it as our right as citizens of a supposedly free nation. Our government has far too many secrets which have nothing to do with national security. We should be more adamant about this type of immediate disclosure than people have prudently requested when demanding the ins and outs of an auto deal or even a divorce settlement.

 

We are often so bold to speak out when it concerns our individual well-being. I’ve seen it many times in my business dealings with people. Why won’t we question even more emphatically when our collective existence is being compromised and threatened by a disconnected and despotic government which has spun out of control of its own accord and has no shame about it! One could possibly overlook the trillions of dollars they have wasted, but never in good conscience the lives lost, the families torn apart, and the loss of our voice as a people. The future could indeed be a grim place if you project the outcome of the current policies and practices of our government if left unchecked.

 

These Inspectors General, men or women who will be given free reign to thoroughly probe every aspect of our government, most especially those branches who hide behind the supposed interests and veils of National Security, will be charged with finding out the whole truth. I think we’re all grown up enough to handle the truth, however ugly it ends up being. They must boldly expose it to the American citizens in a manner which will bring the ugly and festering boil to a head so we might lance it and then drain the infection of sickness within our current system. This purge of the current actors, charlatans, thieves, and other various insidious powers will certainly produce a vacuum which could easily be filled by the many available and hopefully honest participants who wish to truly represent the people. This ideal is what should have happened with the current apparatus but has obviously not thus far.

 

If we are so far gone as a country that tyranny and injustice prevail, revolution can and must be called for by the people to restore the dignity of our nation. It is, in fact, our Constitutional DUTY. Our forefathers, the men who fought for and founded this great nation, would implore us to do the very same. I do not personally desire this outcome, but it remains an option nonetheless. To quote our beloved President, “All options are on the table.” To paraphrase the words of those same founding fathers, if our government will not address a petition for grievances by the American Public, a revolution would then be our responsibility and Divine Right.

 

Quite unfortunately for all involved, I don’t think the outcome of open military revolution, though swift and effective sometimes in the past, will be as harmless as fifty Gettysburg’s or a million Boston Tea Parties. A revolution in the current era will have a de facto bloody and destructive outcome, though it would not be impossible to win. With the advances in technology and the military capability of the incumbent powers, it would be disastrous for our nation to deal with.

 

Our nation’s armed services are already trained in the ways of quelling domestic uprisings and insurrections. I felt a chill when our drill instructors jokingly quipped that some day we might get a chance to use these same tactics on our own people. We’ve had plenty of practice over the last century in other countries. We will probably not survive another civil war as a free nation if we fail. The most likely outcome of a failed civil war or open military coup at this point will be that of a far-right “overt” dictatorship under which we will most likely find our end at the point of the barrels of the other nations who will have been long fed up with our injustices as well.

 

However, no change can be effected as long as the people are forcefully and painfully disconnected from their political system, as a whole. Today we suffer through layers upon layers of rotten and corrupt bureaucracy hoping to effect change. We offer our opinions and input but very little is accomplished except what is in the interest of the most influential capitalists and their minions. The will of the many is ultimately outweighed by the resources of the few. I do not believe the current system can possibly be defined as a democracy. Our current government seems to be rule by corporation and minority interest.

 

Until we stand up to the people who would manufacture death, destruction, and misery on a global scale as a business for the sake of profit we will not advance as a civilization or as a people. I’m not sure if there is a political term for this type of governmental apparatus under which we currently labor. I truly hope a word doesn’t ever need to be invented to describe it on a permanent basis.

 

I call upon each and every person who reads this to do some serious soul-searching and brainstorming to come up with possible solutions. Do not be afraid to discuss these ideas with your peers, your fellow citizens. They can’t eat you yet. My desire for an inquest by independent Inspectors General would be a great place to start. I’m not sure how to get from here to there, though at the same time I know in my heart that a massive overhaul of the government is long overdue.

 

My hope is the longsuffering belief that out of all tumult comes an unparalleled opportunity for an honest self-appraisal as a nation. This change, if effected properly and in time, could be a chance for some truly remarkable and diverse ideas to be manifested within a political framework that doesn’t necessarily need to end in tragedy, bloodshed, or the disenfranchisement of the general populace which has occurred as a result of the status quo. In closing, I will combine the wisdom of so many troubled parents and people of faith throughout the world. “It’s just a phase…and this too, shall pass.”

Posted in 9/11, Al Qaeda, America, Arkansas, Conspiracy, Conspiracy Theories, Dissent, Freedom, George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Justice, Liberty, Life, Media, News, Opinion, Peace, Politics, Random, Religion, Tyranny, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

The Waco File

Posted by jeremiasx on January 30, 2007

Notable cult comedian Bill Hicks made a comment after the smoke cleared around the situation in Waco, Texas. He and a producer had personally covered during the scene as amateur journalists (yea, it really happened…I’m gonna show you) in what might prove to be one of the most poignant statements I’ve heard anyone make about the whole mess.

“If the FBI’s motivating factor for busting down the Koresh compound was child abuse, how come we never see Bradley tanks smashing into Catholic churches?”

Knowing Mr. Hicks’ style of comedy, I’m sure that he and his friend showed up on the scene hoping to obtain the future stuff of great comedy routines…as you can see from this short but uninteresting video. I post it to establish that he was actually there.

BILL HICKS AND PRODUCER PRESENT DURING WACO SIEGE

As Bill found out, to his obvious dismay…the situation ended up being very tragic instead of comical…almost a hundred men, women, and children died through the actions of the government that day. Here is a clip of Bill talking about Waco in his last video interview given before his untimely death at the age of 32 (pancreas cancer).

BILL HICKS COMMENTS ON WACO FIRE IN FINAL VIDEO INTERVIEW

There were TWO congressional investigations, both conducted during the Clinton administration, neither of which found government agents culpable or complicit for the deaths of the men, women, and children in the Waco siege. I’m posting a video of a movie that every interested person should see…it is the documentary that sparked the second investigation by John Danforth (who would later be appointed by Mr. Bush to be our ambassador to the UN) which came to the AMAZING conclusion that the ATF and Army present did not violate posse comitatus, and did not start the fire, and did not fire weapons into the Mt. Carmel complex during the siege. Watch this video for yourself, and then try to rationalize in your own mind (if you can…I could not) how they came to these daft and obviously errant conclusions.

Watch for the familiar faces involved in the case. (Vince Foster, HILLARY CLINTON, Webb Hubbell, Michael Chertoff, John Danforth, Chuck Schumer…a veritable who’s who of the washington power structure, past and present.)

For your consideration…I submit:

Waco: A New Revelation (Part 1)

Waco: A New Revelation (Part 2)

FAIR USE NOTICE: This wordpress account may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

Posted in America, Dissent, Freedom, Hillary Clinton, Justice, Liberty, Life, Peace, Politics, Religion, Tyranny, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Excerpts from Nuremburg…

Posted by jeremiasx on January 28, 2007

Excerpts from Examination of Hermann Goering (1)

goeringwitnesshlsl.jpg

[From “Eighty-Fourth Day, Monday, 3/18/1946, Part 16”, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the
International Military Tribunal. Volume IX. Proceedings: 3/8/1946-3/23/1946. Nuremberg: IMT, 1947.]

[Testimony on 3/18/46]

THE PRESIDENT: Do the Chief prosecutors wish to cross examine?

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You are perhaps aware that you are the only living man who can expound to us the true purposes of the Nazi Party and the inner workings of its leadership?

GOERING: I am perfectly aware of that.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You, from the very beginning, together with those who were associated with you, intended to overthrow and later did overthrow, the Weimar Republic?

GOERING: That was, as far as I am concerned, my firm intention.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And, upon coming to power, you immediately abolished parliamentary government in Germany?

GOERING: We found it to be no longer necessary. Also I should like to emphasize the fact that we were moreover the strongest parliamentary party, and had the majority. But you are correct when you say that parliamentary Procedure was done away with because the various parties were disbanded and forbidden.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You established the Leadership Principle, which you have described as a system under which authority existed only at the top, and is passed downwards and is imposed on the people below; is that correct?

GOERING: In order to avoid any misunderstanding, I should like once more to explain the idea briefly, as I understand it. In German parliamentary procedure in the past responsibility rested with the highest officials, who were responsible for carrying out the anonymous wishes of the majorities, and it was they who exercised the authority. In the Leadership Principle we sought to reverse the direction, that is, the authority existed at the top and passed downwards, while the responsibility began at the bottom and passed upwards.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: In other words, you did not believe in and did not permit government, as we call it, by consent of the governed, in which the people, through their representatives, were the source of power and authority?

GOERING: That is not entirely correct. We repeatedly called on the people to express unequivocally and clearly what they thought of our system, only it was in a different way from that previously adopted and from the system in practice in other countries. We chose the way of a so-called plebiscite. We also took the point of view that even a government founded on the Leadership Principle could maintain itself only if it was based in some way on the confidence of the people. If it no longer had such confidence, then t would have to rule with bayonets, and the Fuehrer was always of the opinion that that was impossible in the long run-to rule against the will of the people.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: But you did not permit the election of those who should act with authority by the people, but they were designated from the top downward continuously, were they not?

GOERING: Quite right. The people were merely to acknowledge the authority of the Fuehrer, or, let us say, to declare themselves in agreement with the Fuehrer. If they gave the Fuehrer their confidence then it was their concern to exercise the other functions. Thus, not the individual persons were to be selected according to the will of the people, but solely the leadership itself.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, was this Leadership Principle supported and adopted by you in Germany because you believed that no people are capable of self-government, or because you believed that some may be, not the German people; or that no matter whether some of us are capable of using our own system, it should not be allowed in Germany?

GOERING: I beg your pardon, I did not quite understand the question, but I could perhaps answer it as follows:

I consider the Leadership Principle necessary because the system which previously existed, and which we called parliamentary or democratic, had brought Germany to the verge of ruin. I might perhaps in this connection remind you that your own President Roosevelt, as far as I can recall-I do not want to quote it word for word-declared, “Certain peoples in Europe have forsaken democracy, not because they did not wish for democracy as such, but because democracy had brought forth men who were too weak to give their people work and bread, and to satisfy them. For this reason the peoples have abandoned this system and the men belonging to it.” There is much truth in that statement. This system had brought ruin by mismanagement and according to my own opinion, only an organization made up of a strong, clearly defined leadership hierarchy could restore order again. But, let it be understood, not against the will of the people, but only when the people, having in the course of time, and by means of a series of elections, grown stronger and stronger, had expressed their wish to entrust their destiny to the National Socialist leadership.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: The principles of the authoritarian government which you set up required, as I understand you, that there be tolerated no opposition by political parties which might defeat or obstruct the policy of the Nazi Party?

GOERING: You have understood this quite correctly. By that time we had lived long enough with opposition and we had had enough of it. Through opposition we had been completely ruined. It was now time to have done with it and to start building up.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: After you came to power, you regarded it necessary, in order to maintain power, to suppress all opposition parties?

GOERING: We found it necessary not to permit any more opposition, yes.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And you also had to have certain organizations to carry out orders-executive organizations, organizations to fight for you if necessary, did you not?

GOERING: Yes, administrative organizations were, of course, necessary. I do not quite understand-organizations to fight what?

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Well, if you wanted certain people killed you had to have some organization that would kill them didn’t you? Rohm and the rest of them were not killed by Hitler’s own hands nor by yours, were they?

GOERING: Rohm-the Rohm affair I explained here clearly- that was a matter of State necessity…

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: I did not ask you . . .

GOERING: … and was carried out by the police.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: But when it was the State’s necessity to ill somebody, you had to have somebody to do it, didn’t you?

GOERING: Yes, just as in other countries, whether it is called secret service or something else, I do not know.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, this system was not a secret system. This entire system was openly avowed, its merits were publicly advocated by yourself and others, and every person entering into the Nazi Party was enabled to know the kind of system of government you were going to set up, wasn’t he?

GOERING: Every person who entered the Party knew that we embraced the Leadership Principle and knew the fundamental measures we wanted to carry out, so far as they were stated in the program. But not everyone who joined the Party knew down to the last detail what was going to happen later.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: But this system was set up openly and was well known, was it not, in every one of its details? As to organization, everybody knew what the Gestapo was, did they not?

GOERING: Yes, everyone knew what the Gestapo was.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And what its program was in general, not in detail?

GOERING: I explained that program clearly. At the very beginning I described that publicly, and I also spoke publicly of the tasks of the Gestapo, and I even wrote about it for foreign countries.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And there was nothing secret about the establishment of a Gestapo as a political police, about the fact that people were taken into protective custody, about the fact that these were concentration camps? Nothing secret about those things, was there?

GOERING: There was at first nothing secret about it at all.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, in tracing the rise of power of the Party you have omitted some such things as, for example the Reichstag fire of 2/27/1933. There was a great purge following that fire, was there not, in which many people were arrested ad many people were killed?

GOERING: I do not know of a single case where a man was killed because of the Reichstag fire, except that of the incendiary, Van der Lubbe, who was sentenced by the court. The other two defendants in this trial were acquitted. Herr Thalmann was not, as you recently erroneously believed, accused; it was the communist representative Torgler. He was acquitted, as was also the Bulgarian, Dimitroff. Relatively few arrests were made in connection with the Reichstag fire. The arrests which you attribute to the Reichstag fire are the arrests of communist functionaries. These arrests, as I have repeatedly stated and wish to emphasize once more, had nothing to do with this fire. The fire merely precipitated their arrest and upset our carefully planned action, thus allowing several of the functionaries to escape.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: In other words, you had lists of Communists already prepared at the time of the Reichstag fire, of persons who should be arrested, did you not?

GOERING: We had always drawn up, beforehand, fairly complete lists of communist functionaries who were to be arrested. That had nothing to do with the fire in the German Reichstag.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: They were immediately put into execution-the arrests, I mean- after the Reichstag fire?

GOERING: Contrary to my intention of postponing this action for a few days and letting it take place according to plan, thereby perfecting the arrangements, the Fuehrer ordered that same night that the arrests should follow immediately. This had the disadvantage, as I said, of precipitating matters.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You and the Fuehrer met at the fire, did you not?

GOERING: That is right.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And then and there you decided to arrest all the Communists that you had listed?

GOERING: I repeat again that the decision for their arrests had been reached some days before this; it simply meant that on that night they were immediately arrested. I would rather have waited a few days according to plan; then some of the important men would not have escaped.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And the next morning the decree was presented to President Von Hindenburg, suspending the provisions of the constitution which we have discussed here, was it not?

GOERING: I believe so, yes.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Who was Karl Ernst?

GOERING: Karl Ernst-whether his first name was Karl I do not now-was the SA leader of Berlin.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And who was Helldorf?

GOERING: Count Helldorf was the subsequent SA leader of Berlin.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And Heines?

GOERING: Heines was the SA leader of Silesia at that time.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, it is known to you, is it not that Ernst made a statement confessing that these three burned the Reichstag and that you and Goebbels planned and furnished the incendiary materials of liquid phosphorus and petroleum which were deposited by you in a subterranean passage for them to get, which passage led from your house to the Reichstag building? You knew of such a statement, did you not?

GOERING: I do not know of any statement by the SA leader Ernst. But I do know of some fairytale published shortly after in the foreign press by Rohm’s chauffeur. This was after 1934.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: But there was such a passage from the Reichstag building to your house, was there not?

GOERING: On one side of the street is the Reichstag building, and opposite is the palace of the Reichstag president. The two are connected by a passage along which the wagons run which carry the coke for the central heating.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And, in any event, shortly after this, Ernst was killed without a trial and without a chance to tell his story, was he not? ”

GOERING: That is not correct. The Reichstag fire was in 2/1933. Ernst was shot on 6/30/1934, because together with Rohm he had planned to overthrow the Government and had plotted against the Fuehrer. He, therefore, had a year and a quarter in which he could have made statements regarding the Reichstag fire, if he had wished to do so.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Well, he had begun to make statements, had he not, and you were generally being accused of burning the Reichstag building? You knew that, did you not? That was the . . .

GOERING: That accusation that I had set fire to the Reichstag came from a certain foreign press. That could not bother me because it was not consistent with the facts. I had no reason or motive for setting fire to the Reichstag. From the artistic point of view I did not at all regret that the assembly chamber was burned- I hoped to build a better one. But I did regret very much that I was forced to find a new meeting place for the Reichstag and, not being able to find one, I had to give up my Kroll Opera House, that is, the second State Opera House, for that purpose. The opera seemed to me much more important than the Reichstag.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Have you ever boasted of burning the Reichstag building, even by way of joking?

GOERING: No. I made a joke, if that is the one you are referring to, when I said that, after this, I should be competing with Nero and that probably people would soon be saying that, dressed in a red toga and holding a lyre in my hand, I looked on at the fire and played while the Reichstag was burning. That was the joke. But the fact was that I almost perished in the flames, which would have been very unfortunate for the German people, but very fortunate for their enemies.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You never stated then that you burned the Reichstag?

GOERING: No. I know that Herr Rauschning said in the book which he wrote, and which has often been referred to here, that I had discussed this with him. I saw Herr Rauschning only twice in my life and only for a short time on each occasion. If I had set fire to the Reichstag, I would presumably have let that be known only to my closest circle of confidants, if at all. I would not have told it to a man whom I did not know and whose appearance I could not describe at all today. That is an absolute
distortion of the truth.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Do you remember the luncheon on Hitler’s birthday in 1942 at the Kasino, the officers’ mess, at the headquarters of the Fuehrer in East Prussia?

GOERING: No.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You do not remember that? I will ask that you be shown the affidavit of General Franz Halder, and I call your attention to his statements which may refresh your recollection. I read it.

“On the occasion of a luncheon on the Fuehrer’s birthday in 1942, the people around the Fuehrer turned the conversation to the Reichstag building and its artistic value. I heard with my own ears how Goring broke into the conversation and shouted: ‘The only one who really knows the Reichstag is I, for I set fire to it.’ And saying this he slapped his thigh.”

GOERING: This conversation did not take place and I request that I be confronted with Herr Halder. First of all I want to emphasize that what is written here is utter nonsense. It says, “The only one who really knows the Reichstag is I.” The Reichstag was known to every representative in the Reichstag. (authors note: NewSpeak LOL) The fire took place only in the general assembly room, and many hundreds or thousands of people knew this room as well as I did. A statement of this type is utter nonsense. How Herr Halder came to make that statement I do not know. Apparently that bad memory, which also let him down in military matters, is the only explanation.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: You know who Halder is?

GOERING: Only too well.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Can you tell us what position he held in the German Army?

GOERING: He was Chief of the General Staff of the Army, and I repeatedly pointed out to the Fuehrer, after the war started, that he would at least have to find a chief who knew something about such matters.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, the Rohm purge you have left a little indefinite. What was it that Rohm did that he was shot? What acts did he commit?

GOERING: Rohm planned to overthrow the Government, and it was intended to kill the Fuehrer also. He wanted to follow it up by a revolution, directed in the first place against the Army, the officers’ corps-those groups which he considered to be reactionary.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And you had evidence of that fact?

GOERING: We had sufficient evidence of that fact.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: But he was never tried in any court where he would have a chance to tell his story as you are telling yours, was he?

GOERING: That is correct. He wanted to bring about a Putsch and therefore the Fuehrer considered it right that this thing should be nipped in the bud-not by a court procedure, but by smashing the revolt immediately.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Were the names of the people who were killed in that purge, following the arrest of Rohm, ever published?

GOERING: Some of the names, yes; but not all of them, I believe.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Who actually killed Rohm? Do you know?

GOERING: I do not know who personally carried out this action.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: To what organization was the order given?

GOERING: That I do not know either, because the shooting of Rohm was decreed by the Fuehrer and not by me, for I was competent in north Germany.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And who took into custody those who were destined for concentration camps, and how many were there?

GOERING: The police carried out the arrest of those who were, first of all, to be interrogated, those who were not so seriously incriminated and of whom it was not known whether they were incriminated or not. A number of these people were released very soon, others not until somewhat later. Just how many were arrested in this connection I cannot tell you. The arrests were made by the police.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: The Gestapo, you mean?

GOERING: I assume so.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And if Milch testified that he saw 700 or 800 in Dachau in 1935, there must have been a very much larger number arrested, since you say many were released. Do you know the number of those that were arrested?

GOERING: I state again, I do not know exactly how many were arrested because the necessary arrests, or the arrest of those who were considered as having a part in this, did not go through me. My action ended, so to speak, on the date when the revolt was smashed. I understood Milch a little differently and I sent a note to my counsel in order that it be made clear, through a question whether Milch meant by these 700 people those concerned with the Rohm Putsch or whether he meant to say that he saw altogether 700 arrested persons there. That is the way I understood it. But to clarify this statement we should have to question Milch again, for I believe this number of 500, 600, or 700, to be far too high for the total number of people arrested in
connection with the Rohm Putsch.

END OF TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS

My commentary below:

Goering’s testimony, as a man faced with imminent justice, which he knew most likely to be a death sentence, is full of inconsistencies and lies, but we are able to see him attempt to shift blame from himself to other leaders within the Nazi party, and even to the civilians whom he consistently referred to as the base of the power pyramid…in a way, he is correct. Had the People decided to do what was moral and just, en masse, Hitler would never have accomplished the savagery and tyranny which nearly enslaved the world. We can all “hope” that such tragic events in politics never “return” to revisit us within our own lifetimes. Still yet, I post this transcript of historical record to remind us of the distinct possibility of an all-pervasive, conspiratorial, treachorous government rising to power and perpetrating injustice upon the entire human existence. In other words, it would be quite FOOLISH to believe that what has happened before is incapable of happening AGAIN.

Posted in America, Arkansas, Dissent, Iraq, Liberty, Life, Peace, Politics, Religion, Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

I’m Never Alone

Posted by jeremiasx on January 28, 2007

masonicgeorge.gif

Submitted in token of the most appropriate and judicious exercise of the tenets of prudence in the performance of presidential duty, achieved through wise and selfless personal discernment, for his bravery, and his ability to change our nation for the better, and his ever present and obvious will for the common good I present the likeness of: George Washington, the Revolutionary War hero, our First President. I have chosen to honor him with this post. I have seen this portrait in person. It is one of the only portraits our Founding Father sat for in his later years. I find it to be quite lifelike and vivid…and therefore more noble perhaps than the more popular portrayals seen in spectacular scenes that iconicize his displays of valor, or political standing, or other various themes. Don’t get me wrong, I like them very much as well…but not quite the same.

lib·er·al Pronunciation (lbr-l, lbrl)

adj.

1.

a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.

d. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.

2.

a. Tending to give freely; generous: a liberal benefactor.

b. Generous in amount; ample: a liberal serving of potatoes.

3. Not strict or literal; loose or approximate: a liberal translation.

4. Of, relating to, or based on the traditional arts and sciences of a college or university curriculum: a liberal education.

authors note: I’ll interject here to note how APPRORPIATELY at the BOTTOM of the list of possible definitions these last ones are…and these are what the masters of spin (and I’m not talking about Conservatives or Republicans, though they are certainly infected hosts and transmit this rhetoric often more than not) want us “Liberals” to be viewed as…

5.

a. Archaic Permissible or appropriate for a person of free birth; befitting a lady or gentleman.

b. Obsolete Morally unrestrained; licentious.

Hello.

Those of you who now will venture back into my blog will understand that I seem most undoubtedly a liberal…but more accurately I am a true liberal, and like most decent people I have conservative social values as well. I believe that we should always be mindful of the Politics of Fear and the Politics of Division…as we’ve all seen throughout recent years, many are prone to change their party initial from R to D or D to R as they saw fit to accomplish their “idealogical evolutions” (I will now interject that I fear the blind faith expressed in that possibility…most seasoned politicians have nothing left of the idealism of their youth. Most SEEM to be concerned with how ideally they are getting paid through whatever means they can, legally, or as we’ve often seen, illegaly)…but I digress…I am not afraid to defend our country and the people and our collective right to exist with ALL of the inalienable rights that our forefathers fought and died for during the settling of this “undiscovered country.” These rights are not granted by any government. They are the granted to the People DIRECTLY through the divine will of God, no intermediary vessel need intercede…they exist eternally, sometimes being prevalent and liberally dispersed and sometimes NOT.

Freedom should never be something one culture seeks to obtain for another culture as each people, in every nation,  should learn to live without fear of change…have the courage to change, and live each day of their lives as if it mattered where you were and what you did to make the world a better place for your having been in it. Freedom is something that any man, woman, or child can not possibly live without, if it be their goal. If they are without, history indicts them of that shameful decision, for the masses are indeed the power, and not the minority. If the masses allow the elite to fool them into believing that they are powerless, then the battle is won for Tyranny.

I indict both those who would seek to cunningly attempt to remove our liberty as those who are afraid to speak up about what is right and what is wrong and do their best to effect a change, in whatever measure they felt compelled to benefit the world without.

It is for the interest of our families, our countrymen, our children, and ALL the good people of the world to earnestly seek the Truth; whatever we find and believe rightly to be relevant to the cause of Truth, we must speak publically the same. We must be bold to speak and not fear the darkness without.

I pray that the voices upon high will cease their mindless chatter but for a moment to take the time to perform an honest self-appraisal and decide for themselves whose side they are on…each asking themselves the important question, “Do I work for the People…or do I work for a Government?

I’m not speaking of “serving your country”, which is just and good…not “serving your People”, which is equally laudable…let me clarify what I detest: “working for a government, to promote the interests of the government, in the sole interests of perpetuating and protecting that government.”

I could not bring myself to make the letters smaller in the word “government” because I don’t want to offend any whose sight may be a little visually impaired. A government is merely a word…it is only a collective symbol, or voice, and hopefully a wise Governor of the People who live within it. All people, throughout time, have, unwaveringly and unwittingly fallen under the notion that a group of elected (we hire them) officials can seek to completely ignore the source of their power (the People) and hold mistaken ideas that the People are ignorant or slow to wit or slow to act in their best interest. History proves this time and time again, throughout the history of various civilizations. We took a step to raise our voice to those powers in November last, but we are far from Justice, my brothers and sisters, and even with new faces we are getting the usual shell game…

For many years, this may seem to have been the case. People have proven historically to be generally content with their lot so long as they don’t perceive the evils of a blatant and insidious organism at the wheel (wheels…) of our ship…as it seems to careen towards a large iceberg. We, those conscientious enough to object, feel it to be our obligation to yell from steerage to captain’s table, “Wake up you lazy, drunken, slothful and greedy bastards…you better listen up and do your jobs or we’re all sunk.” However, it is not fitting to indict the ones who knew not of the Captain’s failure to change a course plotted for distaster, whether he committed it through a critical error, dereliction of duty, or some God forsaken venture that no decent man might wish to ever be forced to comprehend. All stories follow the same pattern, if taken by surprise in the fog, and having committed an honest mistake with pure intentions, the captain and all upon the ship suffer the cruel grips of fate together, but in good conscience. HOWEVER, if the captain’s error is known, and nothing done to rectify it…the crew doth deserve their fate as well. Or perhaps not…it surely isn’t my place to judge, is it?

In any case…the path to the truth is paved in Light. In the darkness there can be no truth, for even if it were there to be found, what would one know what it was? How might we perceive truth which is in darkness? I contend that it can not be done…nor will I accept any other substitute than the truth experienced within the full spectrum of Light…for another man’s account may mislead me as to possibly defend his charitable deeds as done in secret so as not to boast…or on the other end (how extreme) hide some DASTARDLY, CROOKED, FALSE, DECEITFUL, EVIL ACT…we know evil exists in this world…we’re ready to face it as a people…if it is there to be found we will find it and expose it. However, until the Light shines brightly upon the Truth we will never know TRUE FREEDOM for ourselves to be able to impart it to our children so that our People, Our Country, and our Liberty ever endure.

In God We Trust…Namaste…Peace Be With Us and Upon Us…

Posted in America, Arkansas, Dissent, Iraq, Liberty, Life, Peace, Politics, Religion, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Solidarity for Peace

Posted by jeremiasx on January 27, 2007

newtoncountyprotestsmall.jpg

 

In a remarkable display of patriotism and solidarity for peace coinciding with nationwide protests against the war in Iraq…here are our local friends protesting in front of the Newton County courthouse…this was about noon today.

 

I think this kid has a bright future ahead of him…I should like to think so…he’s my son!

I do most of what I do on this blog for people like these, and for my family, and even for those who don’t know what “wrong” is or how to stand up for what’s “right.” *wink*

 

 

mykidprotestingsmall.jpg

Posted in America, Arkansas, Dissent, Iraq, Liberty, Life, Peace, Politics, Religion, Uncategorized | 9 Comments »

A Momentary Lapse of Reason?

Posted by jeremiasx on January 27, 2007

KUDOS TO MY MYSPACE FRIENDS FOR THIS COMPILATION AND BLOG:

There are quite a few inaccuracies, shall we say, when you look closely at
President Bush’s intinerary, his actions and his subsequent speeches on and after September 11th, 2001.

On the morning of September 11th, George Walker Bush was staying at the
Colony Beach & Tennis Resort on Longboat Key in Sarasota, Florida.
His itinerary that morning began with a visit to Principal Gwen Rigell and some students at Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota to discuss the importance of reading.

President Bush left the Colony resort on Longboat Key to head to the school at 8:35am. American Airlines Flight 11 struck World Trade Center 1 (north tower) at 8:46am that morning. President Bush ARRIVED at Booker Elementary at 8:57am.
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

So once again, I would like to clearly put this into perspective.
Can you explain the following revelation made by George W Bush at the
Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Florida in December 2001?
This quote is straight from the official White House website and from CNN

Q “One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you’ve done for this country. And another thing is that, how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack?” (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: “Thank you, Jordan. Well, Jordan, you’re not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card — actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower — the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there’s one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.”

SOURCE 1 – WHITE HOUSE.gov
SOURCE 2 – CNN TRANSCRIPT.

But wait. This wasn’t the only speaking engagement where he claimed he saw AA Flight 11 strike WTC 1 on a TV outside the classroom waiting to go in.
This quote is from his “Town Hall” forum at the Ontario Convention Center in Ontario, California in January 2002.

Q What was the first thing that went through your head when you heard that a plane crashed into the first building?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida. I had gone down to tell my little brother what to do, and — just kidding, Jeb. (Laughter.) And — it’s the mother in me. (Laughter.) Anyway, I was in the midst of learning about a reading program that works. I’m a big believer in basic education, and it starts with making sure every child learns to read. And therefore, we need to focus on the science of reading, not what may feel good or sound good when it comes to teaching children to read. (Applause.) I’m just getting a plug in for my reading initiative.

Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff — well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or — anyway, I’m sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, “America is under attack.”

And in the meantime, this teacher was going on about the curriculum, and I was thinking about what it meant for America to be under attack. It was an amazing thought. But I made up my mind that if America was under attack, we’d get them. (Applause.) I wasn’t interested in lawyers, I wasn’t interested in a bunch of debate. I was interested in finding out who did it and bringing them to justice. I also knew that they would try to hide, and anybody who provided haven, help, food, would be held accountable by the United States of America. (Applause.)

Anyway, it was an interesting day.
SOURCE – OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPT

Yeah, it was a pretty interesting day huh Sir? Nothing like getting a few lame jokes in before you address a question and start talking about an event that happened to kill 3,000 innocent people, after you willingly ignored the intelligence you received one month prior to the attacks warning the U.S that Bin Laden was DETERMINED to STRIKE on your soil. I also like how he says “this teacher was going on about the curriculum” How condescending does that sound? How disrespectful that he can’t even remember Gwen Rigell’s name. How about the fact that she WASN’T EVEN A TEACHER…….SHE WAS THE PRINCIPAL!

Yeah okay, so what? Perhapes he screwed up the order 2 times in 2 separate public speaking engagements in just over a year. Maybe he was referring to seeing the second plane hit WTC 2. Well, probably not.

The only video footage that exists catching American Airlines Flight 77 striking WTC 1 was caught on film by the Naudet brothers from France as they were filming a documentary about NYC firemen. This footage was not made available to the major news networks until later that day on September 11th, as it was just mentioned in the CBC video above.

SO why is this important? BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE for him to have seen the first plane hit WTC 1 LIVE ON TV AND OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM WAITING TO GO IN. NO ONE SAW IT LIVE ON TV AND HE WAS IN HIS LIMOUSINE WHEN IT HIT!!!!.

The only people who saw it hit LIVE were those on the streets or in the buildings in lower Manhattan that morning.

As for the argument that maybe it was the second plane (United Airlines Flight 175) that he meant to say he had seen hit live OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM ON A TV……..well sorry, but you lose again. President Bush was comfortably seated in the classroom when UAL Flight 175 struck WTC 2 (south tower).

Remember when Chief of Staff Andy Card walked into the frame and whispered to George Bush that “A second plane has hit the World Trade Center, the nation is under attack”?
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

It does not add up! There is no possible way to spin this to make an excuse for these contradictions. The American government and George Bush had prior knowledge that these attacks were going to take place.

9-11 was an inside job. I will never be convinced otherwise. I know wholeheartedly that 9-11 was not choreographed by Osama Bin Laden while he sat in a cave in Afghanistan.and ordered 19 Saudi Arabians and Egyptians to carry out those attacks.

It is therefore impossible for Bush to have seen the first plane strike unless he had his own cameraman filming downtown Manhattan that morning with a live closed circuit feed straight to his Limo. It would still be a lie though because he told everyone he saw the first plane hit on a TV outside the classroom. I really hate the term “Conspiracy Theory.” Go ahead and call this a theory, you can think what you want.

***END OF REPOST***

I have been studying…and restudying…the 9/11 commission report based on the highly relevant information I have submitted here. Pick up a copy for free off the web and read it for yourself. The timeline here is laid out quite clearly on pages 5-7 in the report. If Boston and the FAA knew at 8:30 am that the flight had been hijacked, and tracked it all the way into the WTC 1 crash site…why didn’t anyone call the President? I would think something of THAT magnitude WOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO BUSH…yet so many precious minutes later…there he was…reading “My Pet Goat.”

Posted in 9/11, Al Qaeda, America, Arkansas, Dissent, Freedom, George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Justice, Liberty, Life, Media, News, Peace, Politics, Religion, Tyranny, Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

United For Peace and Justice…

Posted by jeremiasx on January 27, 2007

Dissident

 

Friends, Romans, and Countrymen:

Today is the day that we as Americans…united in an overwhelming desire to end the war for oil, war profiteers, and “geopolitical interests”…come together as one to voice our dissent against the tyranny of our current administration, and it’s obvious unwillingness to listen to us, The People, either individually, en masse, or through our right of representation in the Congress.

There will be organizations sponsoring many of these events. One of them can be found here: The United For Peace and Justice Website which gives a schedule of peace marches nationwide. You can participate right here in Arkansas as well…(and if you can’t make it happen up here…make it happen WHEREVER YOU CAN…the local wal-mart parking lot, the state capitol, any university campus, etc.)

Bring signs, bring food, bring a spirit of nonviolent noncooperation and most of all bring a positive mental state because it is only with our collective consciousness, operating at it’s highest potential, that we can effect any change. Bring a friend. Bring two. Also, if you see Doug…tell him he’s DEFINITELY invited. We wouldn’t want to have them view us as hippies if we were acting like anything else. LOL

I know it’s short notice…but the time is late, and the hour is near…and I know most of my readers are up at this hour or will be up by the time this is all going on.

I love you all…namaste…peace.

-Jeremias X

Posted in America, Arkansas, Dissent, Iraq, Liberty, Life, Peace, Politics, Religion, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »